Is Electropolishing Necessary?

Electropolishing and Chemical Passivation: Differences and Similarities

It depends on what the desired outcome is. Chemical passivation will attain a chrome to iron ratio above 1.0 (Cr/Fe), without producing any measurable change in the finish characteristics of the surface while Electropolishing (EP) is designed to remove surface damage from mechanical polishing (MP) and produce a more cleanable featureless smooth surface finish (Fig. 1 & 2).

MP - mechanical polishing
EP - electropolishing

When to Use Electropolishing & Passivation

The need to electropolish a surface is dependent upon the desirable surface finish requirements, while passivation is required by all austenitic stainless surfaces to improve their corrosion resistance, whether they are electropolished or not. Formation of a passive film on the surface does not require electropolishing.

On the other hand, chemical passivation will improve the corrosion resistance of all austenitic stainless steel surfaces, no matter what the surface profile or roughness conditionIt chemically removes the iron and iron oxide from the surface and leaves the chromium oxide at the surface to protect the alloy.

The Effectiveness of Passivation Process

The effectiveness of the passivation process can be quantified or measured in terms of the Cr/Fe (chrome to iron) ratio. The more chromium in the surface, the more corrosion resistance will be present. Chemical cleaning and passivation will improve the surface corrosion resistance and remove surface contamination, but will not remove surface area, roughness, or cold work damage from polishing.

Chemical passivation is required after electropolishing, since electropolishing passivates the surface only to a condition typically attained by phosphoric acidPassivation with citric acid based chelant systems or nitric acid will effectively improve the Cr/Fe ratio and double the corrosion resistance of an electropolished surface alone.

Comparing Passivation and Electropolishing

Comparing the chemical process of passivation to electropolishing is difficult since they produce two different outcomes.

Passivation improves the chemistry of the surface (increases the Cr/Fe ratio) while electropolishing removes surface damage, improves the surface profile and cleanability, or smoothes the surfaceWhile electropolishing passivates the surface, it does not meet the Cr/Fe ratio levels attained by comparative passivation processes.


In summary, if the goal is to attain a set Cr/Fe ratio -then passivation is the process to use but if a cleanable corrosion resistant surface is desired, then electropolishing followed by chemical passivation is the best choice.

Blog Posts

Picture of Mike Montgomery

Mike Montgomery

Since 2012 Mike has served as the Technical Director of Electropolishing at Astro Pak Corporation. With over thirty years of mechanical, machining, and metal finishing experience, Mike brings practical knowledge, capability and excellence to vessel restoration projects across the country. Mike develops and implements training programs, including confined space entry, ensuring technical excellence and safety amongst all Astro Pak MP/EP Technicians.

Blog Posts